Calls for 4chan to be shut down after putrid posts of alleged Christchurch shooter Brenton Tarrant discovered

Annabel Hennessy – The West Australian

A website that was temporarily shut down following accused gunman Brenton Tarrant’s Christchurch massacre has been found to be promoting images and web chats labelling the Australian a “saint”.

An investigation by The West Australian has uncovered the posts, some made this month, on notorious chat website 4chan, which has prompted concern by cyber experts who say the Federal Government should consider shutting the platform down permanently.

“You do have a duty of care to these people and maybe that is through shutting these sites down.” Ross Bark, director of Best Enemies which runs cybersafety workshops in Australian schools, said 4chan was the “wild west of the internet” and telecommunication companies should consider blocking access.

“Wherever there is a violent video (links to it) will land on 4chan … it’s just a massive trolling environment and a lot of online harassment stems from the use of 4Chan,” Mr Bark said.

“You’re not going to be able to stop people sharing things on certain sites unless you block them and I think there needs to be more from the telcos’ side to block these websites.”

He said the Federal Government’s Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material) Bill was yet to be fully tested.

“Facebook isn’t that keen to censor information…(and these) laws need to be tested and then (the Government can) see how they can potentially tighten them up,” he said.

Mr Fletcher said the Federal Government was “committed to removing illegal and harmful content from the internet” and that there were reporting mechanisms in place to take down posts that were deemed abhorrent.

“Executing on that intention requires a considered and measured approach focused on the very worst content,” Mr Fletcher said.

Read the full article here

YouTube warn parents responsible for children’s behaviour on video-streaming platform

Annabel Hennessy – The West Australian

YouTube is warning parents they are responsible for their children’s behaviour on the site after a boom in the number of kids making their own online videos.

The video-streaming platform announced it was updating its terms of service, with changes including a new warning which says parents are liable for their kids’ behaviour on the site.

The changes come after YouTube was hit with a $US170 million ($250 million) fine from American regulators who found the site had “knowingly and illegally” harvested children’s personal information and used it to bombard them with targeted ads.

There has also been a big increase in the number of child YouTubers with a number of the site’s most popular channels now starring children.

While YouTube says its platform is only to be used by children aged 13 and older, cyber safety experts said they did not believe enough was being done to detect accounts belonging to underage children.

Best Enemies director Ross Bark, whose company runs cyber safety workshops, said YouTube had been inconsistent on its age-limit policy and should do more to detect underage accounts.

He said the changes were to protect the platform “legally”.

“I agree that parents do need to take responsibility … and can’t rely on the site to control their child’s viewing habits, however, YouTube could also do a lot more to educate parents.” he said.

Experts warn not to dismiss Joker-related threats as fears emerge film could inspire anti-women extremism

Annabel Hennessy – The West Australian

Violent online threats being inspired by the new Joker movie should not be dismissed as trolling, according to online experts and anti-abuse campaigners who are worried the blockbuster could fuel anti-women extremists.

It comes as police in NSW are running patrols in Randwick, in Sydney’s east, after a threat was posted on the notorious internet forum 4Chan appearing to warn of a potential attack at a screening of the film at a popular cinema in the suburb.

In the US, security around cinemas has also been beefed up after fears the film’s graphic portrayal of a social outcast who commits violent crimes after being sexually rejected could inspire copy-cat attacks.

The movie, starring Joaquin Phoenix and directed by Todd Phillips, has been likened to Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver starring Robert De Niro.

Cyber safety expert Ross Bark said he was worried about parents allowing children to see the film thinking it would be similar to a more typical superhero flick.

“I don’t think anyone under the age of 18 should be seeing this film,” he said.

Curtin University senior lecturer in Literary and Cultural Studies Dr Christina Lee said it would go a long way for the cast and crew of the film to openly condemn violence and talk about how The Joker taps into the current climate of extreme divisiveness.

“ The film is a fictional representation of a comic book supervillain … not as an instructional video,” Dr Lee said.

“This, however, won’t stop certain people who identify as incels … using the movie as propaganda.”

Read the full article here

Influencers out of business as Instagram removes ‘likes’ to tackle mental health impact

Annabel Hennessy – The West Australian

Influencers who falsely inflate their popularity could be put out of business by Instagram’s decision to “hide” likes, according to social media experts.

It comes as the Mark Zuckerberg-owned app has been accused of rolling out the new feature simply as a marketing gimmick rather than a genuine attempt to address its impact on mental health.

Instagram yesterday announced Australian users would no longer see the number of “likes” a post receives, claiming they wanted to “take the competition out of posting”.

The West Australian can also reveal Instagram’s algorithm, which promotes posts with more likes to the top of the feed, will remain the same. Dan Anisse, the vice-president of product at InfluencerDB, said the announcement was bad news for professional Instagrammers who scored brand deals after buying likes.

Social media expert Ross Bark, whose company Best Enemies runs cyber safety workshops in schools, said Instagram would also change its algorithm if it was genuinely concerned about mental health.

“It’s absolutely a business decision to try and get people to post more,” Mr Bark said. “They’re not changing the algorithm so you’ve still got that herd mentality of ‘it’s a competition’.”

Read the full article here

Teenagers as young as 14 are taking drastic measures to stay or get thin according to an Australian government study.

SBS News

Australian teenagers as young as 14 are taking extreme measures including vomiting or taking laxatives to control their weight.

A new government study found, while a very small minority of mid-adolescents met the criteria for anorexia or bulimia, significant numbers had taken action to try and control their weight.

Social media apps like Instagram and Snapchat were considered the most persuasive on young minds.

Cyber safety expert Ross Bark said the role of social media influencers, who post their desirable, but often unrealistic lives online, are a new phenomenon impacting young consumers.

“They’re effectively being driven to be like these influencers when in fact it’s impossible for them to do so. So we’re seeing a dramatic upturn in kids that a lot of anxiety and mental health issues because of that,” Mr Bark said.

For further details on the SBS News story click here

Parents taking over Facebook leads to teens switching off the app

Annabel Hennessy, The Daily Telegraph

FACEBOOK is no longer considered cool by Australian teens with its popularity among youngsters plummeting 70 per cent in two years.

A new survey by Best Enemies Education of 800 Australians aged 13-18 has revealed just 11.57 per cent say the Mark Zuckerberg site is their most used app — a dramatic decline from two years ago when it was ranked number one.

Meanwhile, Instagram and Snapchat’s popularity is soaring, with more than half of teens saying Instagram is their most used app and about one in four saying they use Snapchat the most.

Best Enemies director Ross Bark, who runs cyber-safety courses in NSW schools, conducted the research and said teens no longer wanted to be on Facebook because it had been taken over by their parents.

“They want to use apps where they’re not going to be monitored,” Mr Bark said.

“Even on Instagram a lot of teens have two accounts; one which they get their family members to follow and another where they’ll be … posting risqué content.”

Read the full article in The Daily Telegraph here

Instagram guilt-tripping parents into letting young children open an account or risk being bullied

The Daily Telegraph

INSTAGRAM is guilt-tripping parents into letting children younger than 13 have their own accounts by claiming they will be bullied if they are not on the app.

The social media giant also argues that having a public account­ is “part of the fun”.

It has come under fire from cyber safety experts over its “parents’ guide to Instagram” which claims that kids who don’t have Instagram can “risk social marginalisation”.

Ross Bark and brother Darren from Best Enemies.

Best Enemies director Ross Bark, who runs cyber-safety courses in schools, said it was “ridiculous” to suggest children were going to experience “social marginalisation” purely for not being on the app.

He said that anyone under 18 on the app should have a private account and children under 13 “should definitely not” be on Instagram.

“Social marginalisation sounds like a term that has come out of a marketing manager’s mouth … it sounds like a young person will be on the fringes of society if they are not on Instagram which is a silly suggestion,” Mr Bark said.

Read the full article in The Daily Telegraph here